Stephen Michael Ford

21 papers receiving 761 citations

Peers

Stephen Michael Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 219
  • Immunology and Allergy 68
  • Health 83
  • Clinical Psychology 172
  • Sensory Systems 35
Replace Elizabeth Luckhurst with:
Elizabeth Luckhurst Australia
Christopher Scott Thomas United States
Dominic A. Carone United States
Alexander M. Morin Canada
Marianne Wulff Sweden
Thomas G. Cropley United States
Dmitry V. Romanov Russia
Madhulika A. Gupta Canada
Marie Henrike Geisel Germany
Eva Mazzotti Italy
Stephen Michael Ford relative to Elizabeth Luckhurst Australia Elizabeth Luckhurst's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Elizabeth Luckhurst · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Michael Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Michael Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Michael Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Michael Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Michael Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Michael Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Michael Ford. The network helps show where Stephen Michael Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Michael Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Michael Ford Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Michael Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993221
2 199497
3 200364
4 199457
5
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in social phobia: preliminary findings.
199353
6 200940
7 199335
8 201631
9 201730
10 199929
11 201429
12 199627
13 201224
14 199521
15 201820
16 201720
17 200616
18 199413
19 199311
20 20016

About Stephen Michael Ford

Stephen Michael Ford is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Genetics, Virology and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 21 papers that have together received 845 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV-related health complications and treatments (4 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (2 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (2 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (2 papers) and Mast cells and histamine (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (219 citations), Immunology and Allergy (68 citations), Health (83 citations), Clinical Psychology (172 citations) and Sensory Systems (35 citations). Stephen Michael Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas L.S. Potts, William Harwell Wilson, Ranga Rama Krishnan, Rebecca D. Smith, Harold George Koenig, Teresa A. Coleman, Fuad M. Baroody, Linda K. George, Dan G. Blazer and Patricia E. Molina. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, American Journal of Hematology, Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact