Stephen Lock

20 papers receiving 227 citations

Peers

Stephen Lock
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 33
  • Pharmacy 15
  • Safety Research 29
  • History and Philosophy of Science 17
Replace Doncho Donev with:
Doncho Donev North Macedonia
Karen Albert United States
P Riis Denmark
Dana Katz United States
Damon M. Seils United States
Lois DeBakey United States
Lois Ann Colaianni United States
Samantha Cukier Canada
Judy Watkins United Kingdom
Kathi E. Hanna United States
Stephen Lock relative to Doncho Donev North Macedonia Doncho Donev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Doncho Donev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Lock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Lock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Lock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Lock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Lock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Lock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Lock. The network helps show where Stephen Lock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Lock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Lock Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Lock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199667
2 199839
3 199134
4 199031
5 202030
6 199018
7 199512
8 200110
9 20234
10 19974
11 20194
12 19963
13
Research fraud: discouraging the others.
19902
14
Investigación médica: : cómo prepararla y cómo divulgarla
19902
15
How to do it
19791
16 19901
17
Dr Phillips: a Maida Vale Idyll
19891
18 19891
19 19881
20 20041

About Stephen Lock

Stephen Lock is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Safety Research, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic integrity and plagiarism (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper), Medical and Biological Sciences (1 paper) and Digestive system and related health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (2 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (33 citations), Pharmacy (15 citations), Safety Research (29 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (17 citations). Stephen Lock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Tansey Em, Laura Anselmi, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Kathryn M. Abel, Peter Bower, Matt Sutton, S W Smye, George Dunea, Mark Ashworth and Philip Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Medical History, Nature, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Journal of Internal Medicine and BMC Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact