Stephen Lock

3.4k citations
24 papers · 252 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Lock

19 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers

Stephen Lock
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 39
  • History and Philosophy of Science 20
  • Health Informatics 5
  • Safety Research 27
Replace Doncho Donev with:
Doncho Donev North Macedonia
Karen Albert United States
Ružica Tokalić Croatia
P Riis Denmark
Ella August United States
Kathleen S. Ashton United States
Samantha Cukier Canada
Lois Ann Colaianni United States
Damon M. Seils United States
Dana Katz United States
Stephen Lock relative to Doncho Donev North Macedonia Doncho Donev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Doncho Donev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Lock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Lock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Lock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Lock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Lock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Lock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Lock. The network helps show where Stephen Lock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Lock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Lock Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Lock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199665
2 199835
3 199134
4 199031
5 202027
6 199016
7 199510
8 200110
9 20234
10 19974
11 20194
12 19963
13
Research fraud: discouraging the others.
19902
14
Investigación médica: : cómo prepararla y cómo divulgarla
19902
15
How to do it
19791
16 19881
17
Dr Phillips: a Maida Vale Idyll
19891
18 19891
19 19901
20
Artists and critics: the national medical journals.
19870

About Stephen Lock

Stephen Lock is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Safety Research, Physiology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic integrity and plagiarism (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers) and History of Medical Practice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (2 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (39 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (20 citations), Health Informatics (5 citations) and Safety Research (27 citations). Stephen Lock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tansey Em, Evangelos Kontopantelis, George Dunea, Laura Anselmi, Philip Evans, Matt Sutton, Christos Grigoroglou, Peter Bower, S W Smye and Mark Ashworth. Their work appears in journals such as Medical History, Nature, JAMA, BMC Medicine and Learned Publishing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact