Stephen L. Able

20 papers receiving 583 citations

Peers

Stephen L. Able
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 374
  • Family Practice 14
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 116
  • Clinical Psychology 74
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 43
Replace Keith L. Buescher with:
Keith L. Buescher United States
Angelia Mosley‐Williams United States
Stephen C. Schoonover United States
Mazy E. Gillis United States
Leslie Ann Hazel-Fernandez United States
J Y W Cheng Hong Kong
Patricia Carson Canada
Gabriela Peretti Wagner Brazil
Andrew Kirk United Kingdom
Harry Brierley United Kingdom
Stephen L. Able relative to Keith L. Buescher United States Keith L. Buescher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29×
Keith L. Buescher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen L. Able

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen L. Able's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen L. Able with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen L. Able more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen L. Able

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen L. Able. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen L. Able. The network helps show where Stephen L. Able may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen L. Able, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen L. Able Line = papers co-authored together Stephen L. Able links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2006212
2 2006161
3 200661
4 201453
5 200643
6 201119
7 201413
8 20149
9 20109
10
Inflation Uncertainty, Investment Spending, and Fiscal Policy
19808
11 20167
12 19836
13 20186
14 20143
15 20133
16
Defense spending and economic activity
19802
17
Inventory Recession Ahead
19792
18 20131
19 20101
20 20131

About Stephen L. Able

Stephen L. Able is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Pharmacology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 620 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (3 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (2 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (2 papers), Economic theories and models (1 paper) and Climate Change Policy and Economics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (374 citations), Family Practice (14 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (116 citations), Clinical Psychology (74 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (43 citations). Stephen L. Able has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ralph W. Swindle, Joseph Andrew Johnston, Lenard A. Adler, Meryl I. Brod, Maureen J. Lage, Trong Kim Le, Jacqueline Brown, Rebecca L Robinson, Li Li and Onur Başer. Their work appears in journals such as Econometric Reviews, Value in Health, International Clinical Psychopharmacology, Journal of money credit and banking and Journal of Medical Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact