Stephen John
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy top 2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Papers in
-
- Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies 7
- Risk Perception and Management 5
- Climate Change Communication and Perception 4
-
- Ethics in medical practice 5
- Co-authors
- Juliet A. Usher‐Smith (4 shared papers)Rebecca A. Dennison (4 shared papers)Anthony Kessel (1 shared paper)John McMillan (1 shared paper)Angus Dawson (1 shared paper)Eli Y. Adashi (1 shared paper)Marcel Verweij (1 shared paper)Norman Daniels (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (4 papers)Journal of Applied Philosophy (4 papers)Synthese (2 papers)BMC Public Health (2 papers)Journal of Medical Ethics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Stephen John
40 papers receiving 447 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- History and Philosophy of Science 60
- Philosophy 127
- Sociology and Political Science 233
- General Health Professions 90
- General Decision Sciences 7
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen John
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen John more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen John
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen John. The network helps show where Stephen John may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen John, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 91 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 56 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 6 |
About Stephen John
Stephen John is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Physiology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (7 papers), Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Risk Perception and Management (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (4 papers) and Climate Change and Geoengineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (60 citations), Philosophy (127 citations), Sociology and Political Science (233 citations), General Health Professions (90 citations) and General Decision Sciences (7 citations). Stephen John has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Juliet A. Usher‐Smith, Rebecca A. Dennison, Anthony Kessel, John McMillan, Angus Dawson, Eli Y. Adashi, Marcel Verweij, Norman Daniels, Richard Ashcroft and Ainsley J. Newson. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Journal of Applied Philosophy, Synthese, BMC Public Health and Journal of Medical Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.