Dan Stone

1.4k citations
95 papers · 735 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Stone

68 papers receiving 567 citations

Peers

Dan Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • History 189
  • Political Science and International Relations 249
  • Sociology and Political Science 309
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 52
  • Emergency Medicine 42
Replace Jay Corzine with:
Jay Corzine United States
Mark Nash United States
Sheldon M. Stern Canada
Amanda Anderson United States
Desmond Manderson Canada
James W. McAuley United Kingdom
Dominic Bryan United Kingdom
Michael Brown United Kingdom
Marius Turda United Kingdom
RE Morgan Slovenia
Dan Stone relative to Jay Corzine United States Jay Corzine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
Jay Corzine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Stone. The network helps show where Dan Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Dan Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Stone Line = papers co-authored together Dan Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200476
2 200263
3
Hannah Arendt and the Uses of History: Imperialism, Nation, Race, and Genocide
200742
4 199941
5
Breeding Superman: Nietzsche, Race and Eugenics in Edwardian and Interwar Britain
200241
6 200940
7 201336
8 200034
9 200427
10 200425
11 200623
12 200121
13 200316
14 200815
15 200513
16 199612
17 201812
18 200111
19 200810
20 201110

About Dan Stone

Dan Stone is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Social Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 95 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (28 papers), European history and politics (21 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (16 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (7 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (6 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (6 papers), Medical History and Research (5 papers) and Philosophy, History, and Historiography (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (189 citations), Political Science and International Relations (249 citations), Sociology and Political Science (309 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (52 citations) and Emergency Medicine (42 citations). Dan Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alistair Morrison, Richard H. King, N V Doraiswamy, David Clark, Kirsten Major, Avril Blamey, Kwamena Sekyi Dickson, Deborah Shipton, Mhairi Mackenzie and Eleni Petridou. Their work appears in journals such as Patterns of Prejudice, Journal of Genocide Research, Injury Prevention, Rethinking History and Jewish Social Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact