Stephen J. Schaefer

566 citations
8 papers · 486 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
    • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
    • Remote Sensing and Land Use
  • Geophysics top 10%
    • Geological and Geochemical Analysis

Papers in

Stephen J. Schaefer

8 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers

Stephen J. Schaefer
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Atmospheric Science 188
  • Geophysics 187
  • Global and Planetary Change 199
  • Geology 50
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 18
Replace C. Werner with:
C. Werner New Zealand
Baldur Bergsson Iceland
Vladimir Conde Sweden
Scott D. Doiron United States
Brendan McCormick Kilbride United Kingdom
Richard L. Wunderman United States
A. Jeff Sutton United States
J.C. Le Roulley France
A. N. Davis United States
P. Hédervári Hungary
Stephen J. Schaefer relative to C. Werner New Zealand C. Werner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
C. Werner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Schaefer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Schaefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Schaefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Schaefer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Schaefer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Schaefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Schaefer. The network helps show where Stephen J. Schaefer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Stephen J. Schaefer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen J. Schaefer Line = papers co-authored together Stephen J. Schaefer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 1992132
2 2003118
3 199962
4 199654
5 200045
6 199339
7 199129
8 19977

About Stephen J. Schaefer

Stephen J. Schaefer is a scholar working on Geophysics, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Geology and Paleontology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (4 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (4 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (3 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (1 paper), Geological and Geophysical Studies (1 paper) and Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (188 citations), Geophysics (187 citations), Global and Planetary Change (199 citations), Geology (50 citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (18 citations). Stephen J. Schaefer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stanley N. Williams, N. A. Krotkov, G. J. Bluth, Dina L. López, A. J. Krueger, Simon Carn, Matthew Watson, Saswati Datta, Roderic A. Parnell and Kurt Roggensack. Their work appears in journals such as Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, Geophysical Research Letters, Science and Eos.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact