Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

1.7M citations
22.1k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Geophysics top 0.05%
    • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
    • High-pressure geophysics and materials
    • earthquake and tectonic studies

Papers in

    • Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis 3.1k
    • Geological and Geochemical Analysis 6.5k
    • High-pressure geophysics and materials 2.8k
    • earthquake and tectonic studies 2.1k

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

21.2k papers receiving 1.6M citations

Peers

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 388.3k
  • Geophysics 571.9k
  • Paleontology 199.9k
  • Environmental Chemistry 235.8k
  • Atmospheric Science 328.9k
Replace Earth and Planetary Science Letters with:
Earth and Planetary Science Letters United States
Chemical Geology United States
Geology United States
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres United States
Geophysical Research Letters United States
Geological Society of America Bulletin United States
Earth-Science Reviews United States
Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology United States
Nature Geoscience United States
Environmental Science & Technology United States
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta relative to Earth and Planetary Science Letters United States Earth and Planetary Science Letters's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Earth and Planetary Science Letters · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.

About Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

The 22.1k papers published in Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta in the last decades have received a total of 1.7M indexed citations . Papers published in Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta usually cover Geochemistry and Petrology (5.3k papers), Geophysics (7.3k papers), Environmental Chemistry (2.9k papers), Filtration and Separation (580 papers) and Paleontology (2.0k papers) specifically the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (6.5k papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3.8k papers), Astro and Planetary Science (3.3k papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (3.1k papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (2.8k papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (2.3k papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (2.1k papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (2.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta are Samuel Epstein, Robert A. Berner, Edward Anders, Michael J. DeNiro, K. H. Wedepohl, Harmon Craig, John I. Hedges, S. R. Taylor, Robert N. Clayton and T. K. Mayeda.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact