Stephen J. Proctor

4.1k citations
49 papers · 1.8k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen J. Proctor

49 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Stephen J. Proctor
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Hematology 735
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 713
  • Genetics 401
  • Immunology 450
  • Oncology 388
Replace Enrico Pogliani with:
Enrico Pogliani Italy
Javier de la Serna Spain
Rika Sakai Japan
Cynthia L. Toze Canada
Louis F. Diehl United States
Penelope R. A. Taylor United Kingdom
Ho‐Jin Shin South Korea
Gunnar Juliusson Sweden
Samantha Jaglowski United States
Wing‐Yan Au China
Stephen J. Proctor relative to Enrico Pogliani Italy Enrico Pogliani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Enrico Pogliani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Proctor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Proctor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Proctor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Proctor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Proctor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Proctor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Proctor. The network helps show where Stephen J. Proctor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen J. Proctor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen J. Proctor Line = papers co-authored together Stephen J. Proctor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003248
2 2009164
3 2010156
4 1998151
5 2002118
6 199177
7 201258
8 200351
9 197746
10 200541
11 199240
12 198838
13 200334
14 200331
15 200529
16 199828
17 200128
18 199028
19 199027
20 200227

About Stephen J. Proctor

Stephen J. Proctor is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (21 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (15 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (8 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (7 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (7 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (5 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (5 papers) and Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (735 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (713 citations), Genetics (401 citations), Immunology (450 citations) and Oncology (388 citations). Stephen J. Proctor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include Penelope R. A. Taylor, Anne M. Dickinson, Graham Jackson, Tryfonia Mainou‐Fowler, P. W. G. Saunders, Anne Lennard, Martin Howard, Peter G. Middleton, Annette Neylon and Jennifer Wilkinson. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, British Journal of Haematology, Transplantation, Leukemia Research and Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact