Stephen Isbel

61 papers receiving 567 citations

Peers

Stephen Isbel
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 43
  • Occupational Therapy 112
  • Rehabilitation 111
  • Human-Computer Interaction 71
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 189
Replace Josiane Lettre with:
Josiane Lettre Canada
Linda Beuscher United States
Lihui Pu Australia
Ji‐Hyuk Park South Korea
Pamela Toto United States
Camilla Malinowsky Sweden
Anne Lund Norway
Liv Halvorsrud Norway
Juliet Harvey United Kingdom
Emily Nalder Canada
Stephen Isbel relative to Josiane Lettre Canada Josiane Lettre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Josiane Lettre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Isbel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Isbel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Isbel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Isbel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Isbel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Isbel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Isbel. The network helps show where Stephen Isbel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Isbel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Isbel Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Isbel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019145
2 202042
3 201932
4 202026
5 201625
6 201821
7 201921
8 201621
9 201518
10 201918
11 202217
12 201815
13 202212
14 201812
15 202012
16 202010
17 20229
18 20227
19 20227
20 20217

About Stephen Isbel

Stephen Isbel is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Occupational Therapy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 70 papers that have together received 586 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (14 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (14 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (14 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (7 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (5 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (43 citations), Occupational Therapy (112 citations), Rehabilitation (111 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (71 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (189 citations). Stephen Isbel has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Nathan M. D’Cunha, Jane Kellett, Nenad Naumovski, Andrew J. McKune, Jane Frost, Ekavi Georgousopoulou, Dung Tuan Nguyen, Maggie Jamieson, Alison Wicks and Ted Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, Dementia, Journal of Applied Gerontology, Digital Health and British Journal of Occupational Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact