Mong‐Lin Yu

635 citations
64 papers · 406 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Mong‐Lin Yu

58 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers

Mong‐Lin Yu
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Occupational Therapy 69
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 74
  • Clinical Psychology 107
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 43
  • Emergency Medical Services 20
Replace Anna van der Gaag with:
Anna van der Gaag United Kingdom
Nicole Thomson Canada
Antoine Bailliard United States
Loree A. Primeau United States
Anne‐Stine Dolva Norway
Erinn H. Finke United States
Gloria Frolek Clark United States
Diane Parham United States
Mary Lawlor United States
Stanford E. Rubin United States
Mong‐Lin Yu relative to Anna van der Gaag United Kingdom Anna van der Gaag's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Anna van der Gaag · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mong‐Lin Yu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mong‐Lin Yu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mong‐Lin Yu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mong‐Lin Yu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mong‐Lin Yu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mong‐Lin Yu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mong‐Lin Yu. The network helps show where Mong‐Lin Yu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mong‐Lin Yu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mong‐Lin Yu Line = papers co-authored together Mong‐Lin Yu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201919
2 202219
3 201918
4 201818
5 201816
6 201815
7 202014
8 201113
9 202013
10 201812
11 202012
12 202112
13 201011
14 201111
15 201210
16 202310
17 201710
18 20219
19 20219
20 20179

About Mong‐Lin Yu

Mong‐Lin Yu is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Occupational Therapy, General Health Professions and Education, having authored 64 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (14 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (13 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers), Child Therapy and Development (8 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (7 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (69 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (74 citations), Clinical Psychology (107 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (43 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (20 citations). Mong‐Lin Yu has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Ted Brown, Jamie Etherington, Michele Haynes, Jenny Ziviani, Stephen Isbel, Ellie Fossey, Helen Bourke‐Taylor, Janeen Baxter, Jane Cooper and Aislinn Lalor. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, International Journal of Play, Research in Developmental Disabilities and American Journal of Occupational Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact