Alison Wicks

467 citations
40 papers · 317 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Alison Wicks

36 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

Alison Wicks
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Occupational Therapy 194
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 31
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 91
  • Rehabilitation 28
  • General Health Professions 75
Replace Sarah Kantartzis with:
Sarah Kantartzis United Kingdom
Salvador Simó Algado Spain
Frank Kronenberg South Africa
Anneli Nyman Sweden
Bonny Jung Canada
Ann Bossers Canada
Mary Morley United Kingdom
Jeannine Millsteed Australia
Sarah Barradell Australia
Josh Cameron United Kingdom
Alison Wicks relative to Sarah Kantartzis United Kingdom Sarah Kantartzis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Sarah Kantartzis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alison Wicks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison Wicks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison Wicks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison Wicks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison Wicks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison Wicks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison Wicks. The network helps show where Alison Wicks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alison Wicks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alison Wicks Line = papers co-authored together Alison Wicks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200531
2 200326
3 201625
4 201524
5 201921
6 200620
7 201418
8 201018
9 201712
10 201812
11 201311
12 200110
13 20069
14 20159
15
'SERPS Up': support, engagement and retention of postgraduate students - a model of postgraduate support
20058
16 20056
17 20106
18 20006
19 20086
20 20106

About Alison Wicks

Alison Wicks is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Sociology and Political Science, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 40 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (21 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (7 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (5 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (4 papers), Disability Education and Employment (2 papers), Musicians’ Health and Performance (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers) and RFID technology advancements (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (194 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (31 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (91 citations), Rehabilitation (28 citations) and General Health Professions (75 citations). Alison Wicks has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Gail Whiteford, Maggie Jamieson, Stephen Isbel, Jennie M. Scarvell, Eric Asaba, Samuel Fosso Wamba, Francesco Sofo, Laurie Grealish, Tanya Lawlis and Ingeborg Nilsson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Occupational Science, Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Health Promotion International and Nurse Education in Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact