Stephen Ingram

696 citations
12 papers · 482 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Ingram

10 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Stephen Ingram
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 83
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 303
  • Hardware and Architecture 45
  • Signal Processing 62
  • Biophysics 26
Replace E. Wes Bethel with:
E. Wes Bethel United States
C.T. Silva United States
Gwenaël Doërr France
Anastasios Sidiropoulos United States
R. H. Perrott United Kingdom
M.D. Swanson United States
Pei-Yu Lin Taiwan
Bettina Messmer Switzerland
Frank Hartung Germany
George M. Slota United States
Stephen Ingram relative to E. Wes Bethel United States E. Wes Bethel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
E. Wes Bethel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Ingram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Ingram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Ingram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Ingram. The network helps show where Stephen Ingram may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Ingram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Ingram Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Ingram links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2008118
2 201479
3 200470
4 201066
5 201458
6 201455
7 201429
8 20153
9 20082
10
Glint: An MDS Framework for Costly Distance Functions
20121
11 20131
12
High-Dimensional Data Analysis
20130

About Stephen Ingram

Stephen Ingram is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing, Artificial Intelligence and Hardware and Architecture, having authored 12 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (5 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (4 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (2 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (2 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (2 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (2 papers), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (1 paper) and Advanced Database Systems and Queries (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (83 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (303 citations), Hardware and Architecture (45 citations), Signal Processing (62 citations) and Biophysics (26 citations). Stephen Ingram has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Tamara Munzner, Marc Olano, Matthew Brehmer, Pravin Bhat, Greg Turk, Andrew Warfield, Nicholas J. A. Harvey, Jonathan Stray, Michael Sedlmair and Torsten Möller. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Neurocomputing, cIRcle (University of British Columbia), Operating Systems Design and Implementation and DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact