Stephen Ingram

694 citations
11 papers · 525 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Ingram

10 papers receiving 491 citations

Peers

Stephen Ingram
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 88
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 340
  • Hardware and Architecture 44
  • Signal Processing 60
  • Biophysics 27
Replace Nathaniel Dean with:
Nathaniel Dean United States
Gwenaël Doërr France
Georg Sander Germany
Micah Goldblum United States
Soon Tee Teoh United States
Sergey Pupyrev United States
Yuntao Jia United States
R. H. Perrott United Kingdom
M.D. Swanson United States
Sebastian Leipert Germany
Stephen Ingram relative to Nathaniel Dean United States Nathaniel Dean's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Nathaniel Dean · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Ingram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Ingram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Ingram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Ingram. The network helps show where Stephen Ingram may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Ingram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Ingram Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Ingram links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2008132
2 201479
3 200477
4 201071
5 201471
6 201461
7 201428
8
Glint: An MDS Framework for Costly Distance Functions
20123
9 20152
10 20041
11
High-Dimensional Data Analysis
20130

About Stephen Ingram

Stephen Ingram is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Hardware and Architecture, Signal Processing and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 11 papers that have together received 525 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (4 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (2 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (2 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (2 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (2 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (2 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (1 paper) and Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (88 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (340 citations), Hardware and Architecture (44 citations), Signal Processing (60 citations) and Biophysics (27 citations). Stephen Ingram has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Tamara Munzner, Marc Olano, Matthew Brehmer, Pravin Bhat, Greg Turk, Jonathan Stray, Nicholas J. A. Harvey, Andrew Warfield, Michael Sedlmair and Steven Bergner. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Neurocomputing, Lecture notes in computer science, DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) and Operating Systems Design and Implementation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact