Jonathan Stray

729 citations
11 papers · 267 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Stray

11 papers receiving 249 citations

Peers

Jonathan Stray
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Health Informatics 12
  • Communication 53
  • Safety Research 50
  • General Social Sciences 16
  • Computer Science Applications 18
Replace Aida Mostafazadeh Davani with:
Aida Mostafazadeh Davani United States
Esin Durmus United States
Lucy Vasserman United States
Claudia Müller-Birn Germany
Samuel Carton United States
Jack Bandy United States
Kaitlyn Zhou United States
Bastian Haarmann Germany
Christopher Rytting United States
Bahareh Heravi Ireland
Jonathan Stray relative to Aida Mostafazadeh Davani United States Aida Mostafazadeh Davani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Aida Mostafazadeh Davani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Stray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Stray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Stray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Stray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Stray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Stray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Stray. The network helps show where Jonathan Stray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Stray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Stray Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Stray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201997
2 201458
3 202344
4 202031
5 202212
6 202312
7 20196
8 20234
9 20251
10 20251
11 20191

About Jonathan Stray

Jonathan Stray is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Information Systems and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Web Data Mining and Analysis (2 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers), Topic Modeling (2 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (1 paper) and Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (12 citations), Communication (53 citations), Safety Research (50 citations), General Social Sciences (16 citations) and Computer Science Applications (18 citations). Jonathan Stray has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Brehmer, Stephen Ingram, Tamara Munzner, Ravi Iyer, Joseph Henrich, Iyad Rahwan, Jean‐François Bonnefon, Richard McElreath, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer and Joel Z. Leibo. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Human Behaviour, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, PLoS ONE, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and First Monday.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact