Stephen H. Schultz

8 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

Stephen H. Schultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 126
  • Biological Psychiatry 6
  • General Health Professions 81
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 99
  • Emergency Medical Services 13
Replace Ata Pourabbasi with:
Ata Pourabbasi Iran
Dong‐Sheng Tzeng Taiwan
Lucie Kališová Czechia
Kyungmi Lee South Korea
Mohamed Adil Shah Khoodoruth Qatar
Drystan F. Phillips United States
Sundararajan Rajagopal United Kingdom
Tzu‐Hsin Huang Taiwan
Yang Shao China
Laura Booi United Kingdom
Stephen H. Schultz relative to Ata Pourabbasi Iran Ata Pourabbasi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.5×
Ata Pourabbasi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen H. Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen H. Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen H. Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen H. Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen H. Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen H. Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen H. Schultz. The network helps show where Stephen H. Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Stephen H. Schultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen H. Schultz Line = papers co-authored together Stephen H. Schultz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Schizophrenia: a review.
2007184
2 200464
3
International health training in family practice residency programs.
199835
4
Family medicine in Iran: the birth of a new specialty.
200529
5
Assessing teamwork: a reliable five-question survey.
201228
6 201024
7 19941
8 20051
9 20220

About Stephen H. Schultz

Stephen H. Schultz is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Ophthalmology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Health and Medical Education (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper), Family Dynamics and Relationships (1 paper), Global Health and Surgery (1 paper), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper) and Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (126 citations), Biological Psychiatry (6 citations), General Health Professions (81 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (99 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (13 citations). Stephen H. Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Cleveland G. Shields, Samuel LeBaron, Colleen T. Fogarty, Stephen J. Lurie, Nicholas Jospe, Ronald M. Epstein, Sean C. Meldrum, John T. Hansen, Lindsey C. Henson and Anne C. Nofziger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Palliative Medicine, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, JAMA, The Clinical Teacher and Family Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact