Stephen Emmott

27 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Stephen Emmott
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Ecological Modeling 266
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 206
  • Information Systems and Management 108
  • Global and Planetary Change 264
  • Molecular Biology 766
Replace Jan Christoph Thiele with:
Jan Christoph Thiele Germany
Karen Cranston United States
Andreas Lemke Germany
Ira Cooke Australia
Paulien Hogeweg Netherlands
Nico M. Franz United States
Nirav C. Merchant United States
Duncan Temple Lang United States
Stefan Schmidt Germany
Maria Victoria Schneider United Kingdom
Stephen Emmott relative to Jan Christoph Thiele Germany Jan Christoph Thiele's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Jan Christoph Thiele · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Emmott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Emmott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Emmott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Emmott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Emmott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Emmott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Emmott. The network helps show where Stephen Emmott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Emmott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Emmott Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Emmott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014301
2 2014164
3 2011164
4 2013153
5 2013128
6 2013125
7 2013123
8 2016100
9 201188
10 201576
11 201563
12
Towards 2020 Science
200649
13 201346
14 201444
15 201636
16 201424
17 201421
18 201618
19 201117
20 201211

About Stephen Emmott

Stephen Emmott is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Molecular Biology and Environmental Engineering, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scientific Computing and Data Management (5 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (4 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers), Climate variability and models (3 papers), Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (2 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (2 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (2 papers) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (266 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (206 citations), Information Systems and Management (108 citations), Global and Planetary Change (264 citations) and Molecular Biology (766 citations). Stephen Emmott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Boyan Yordanov, Sara-Jane Dunn, Graziano Martello, Austin G Smith, Andrew M. Phillips, Drew W. Purves, Tim Newbold, Alex W. Chin, Celestino Creatore and Michael Harfoot. Their work appears in journals such as Science, PLoS Computational Biology, Nature, ACS Synthetic Biology and Diversity and Distributions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact