Stephen Eckel

1.9k citations
53 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Eckel

49 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Stephen Eckel
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 942
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 7
  • Condensed Matter Physics 89
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 73
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 39
Replace K. M. O’Hara with:
K. M. O’Hara United States
M. Kumakura Japan
Martin M. Boyd United States
Kristan L. Corwin United States
M. W. Reynolds Netherlands
A. Casey United Kingdom
K. A. H. van Leeuwen Netherlands
A.G. Mann Australia
A. Cimmino Australia
Stephen Eckel relative to K. M. O’Hara United States K. M. O’Hara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
K. M. O’Hara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Eckel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Eckel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Eckel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Eckel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Eckel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Eckel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Eckel. The network helps show where Stephen Eckel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Eckel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Eckel Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Eckel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014260
2 201492
3 201073
4 202154
5 201340
6 201836
7 201833
8 201232
9 202030
10 202230
11 201629
12 202128
13 201827
14 201627
15 202426
16 201023
17 201923
18 201522
19 201719
20 202018

About Stephen Eckel

Stephen Eckel is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Artificial Intelligence, Spectroscopy and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (37 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (28 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (15 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (10 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (6 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (6 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (4 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (942 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (7 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (89 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (73 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (39 citations). Stephen Eckel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gretchen K. Campbell, Fred Jendrzejewski, Daniel S. Barker, C. J. Lobb, Mark Edwards, S. K. Lamoreaux, Alexander O. Sushkov, Julia Scherschligt, Eric B. Norrgard and Charles W. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. A, Physical Review A, Review of Scientific Instruments, New Journal of Physics and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact