Stephen E. Loeb

648 citations
27 papers · 486 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen E. Loeb

24 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers

Stephen E. Loeb
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Information Systems and Management 255
  • Accounting 178
  • Safety Research 70
  • Management Information Systems 51
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 45
Replace M. Todd Royle with:
M. Todd Royle United States
Judith S. Eaton United States
Ferda Erdem Türkiye
Ericka R. Lawrence United States
Angela K. Miles United States
Timothy J. Keaveny United States
Roderick W. Gilkey United States
Jin Cheng China
James L. Oakley United States
Lawrence S. Kleiman United States
Stephen E. Loeb relative to M. Todd Royle United States M. Todd Royle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.1×
M. Todd Royle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Loeb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Loeb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Loeb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Loeb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Loeb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Loeb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Loeb. The network helps show where Stephen E. Loeb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Loeb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Loeb Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Loeb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Relevance and utility of courses in medical ethics. A survey of physicians' perceptions.
198574
2 197165
3 199158
4 199230
5 199429
6 201328
7 198926
8 198925
9
Ethics in the accounting profession
197824
10 198419
11
Auditing : a risk analysis approach
198517
12 201015
13 200312
14 199711
15 200010
16 20028
17 20126
18 19866
19
A behavioral study of CPA ethics
19715
20 19875

About Stephen E. Loeb

Stephen E. Loeb is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Accounting, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (11 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (3 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (2 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Housing Market and Economics (1 paper) and Technology Assessment and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (255 citations), Accounting (178 citations), Safety Research (70 citations), Management Information Systems (51 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (45 citations). Stephen E. Loeb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Edmund D. Pellegrino, Joanne W. Rockness, Daniel T. Ostas, Gary Edwards, Adil E. Shamoo, Paul J. Miranti and Lawrence A. Gordon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Journal of Business Ethics, The Accounting Review, Journal of Accounting Research and Issues in Accounting Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact