Stephen Davies

209 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Stephen Davies
Comparison fields: 5 of 194
  • Music 440
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 315
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 889
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 602
  • Philosophy 415
Replace Nick Freeman with:
Nick Freeman United Kingdom
Colin Martindale United States
Paul Johnson United Kingdom
John W. Atkinson United States
Alan Page Fiske United States
Arnold Goldberg United States
Carey Jewitt United Kingdom
Carl Rhodes Australia
Jacob B. Hirsh Canada
Scott Barry Kaufman United States
Stephen Davies relative to Nick Freeman United Kingdom Nick Freeman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22×
Nick Freeman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Davies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Davies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Davies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Davies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Davies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Davies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Davies. The network helps show where Stephen Davies may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Davies, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Davies Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Davies links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 259 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986185
2 2001169
3 1987127
4 1984126
5 2001106
6 2012104
7 1991102
8 1997101
9 198083
10 199174
11 200170
12 200365
13
Definitions of art
199163
14 200162
15 197955
16 199255
17 201454
18 197250
19
Economics of Industrial Organisation
199150
20 199647

About Stephen Davies

Stephen Davies is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Music, Economics and Econometrics, Philosophy and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 259 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musicology and Musical Analysis (38 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (22 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (21 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (17 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (15 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (13 papers), Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (13 papers) and Visual Culture and Art Theory (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (440 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (315 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (889 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (602 citations) and Philosophy (415 citations). Stephen Davies has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lars Eriksson, Victoria Chan‐Palay, Christer Köhler, Roger Clarke, Michael Waterson, Bruce Lyons, Jerrold Levinson, Peter Kivy, D. Ramsden and Gerard McCarthy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, The British Journal of Aesthetics, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Aging & Mental Health and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact