Stephen D. Comer

472 citations
22 papers · 282 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen D. Comer

18 papers receiving 238 citations

Peers

Stephen D. Comer
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Algebra and Number Theory 77
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 222
  • Management Science and Operations Research 88
  • Geometry and Topology 49
  • Artificial Intelligence 97
Replace Klaus Denecke with:
Klaus Denecke Germany
J. Płonka Poland
Marlow Anderson United States
Todd Feil United States
H. Peter Gumm Germany
Stojan Bogdanović Serbia
Marcel Jackson Australia
Věra Trnková Czechia
Domenico Freni Italy
Robert W. Quackenbush Canada
Stephen D. Comer relative to Klaus Denecke Germany Klaus Denecke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Klaus Denecke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. Comer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. Comer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. Comer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. Comer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. Comer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. Comer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. Comer. The network helps show where Stephen D. Comer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Stephen D. Comer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen D. Comer Line = papers co-authored together Stephen D. Comer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198486
2 199146
3 198432
4 197217
5 197513
6 198312
7 199512
8 197211
9 198410
10 197610
11 19917
12 19695
13 20095
14 19694
15 19724
16 19842
17 19742
18 19721
19 19821
20 19851

About Stephen D. Comer

Stephen D. Comer is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Algebra and Number Theory, Geometry and Topology, Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Physics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Logic (12 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (6 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (5 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (5 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (5 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (4 papers), semigroups and automata theory (4 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (77 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (222 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (88 citations), Geometry and Topology (49 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (97 citations). Stephen D. Comer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Tarek Sayed Ahmed, Hajnal Andréka, Istvàn Németi and Judit X. Madarász. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Journal of Symbolic Logic, Mathematische Nachrichten and Journal of Algebra.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact