Stephen Charles

1.3k citations
45 papers · 733 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Charles

43 papers receiving 706 citations

Peers

Stephen Charles
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Ophthalmology 445
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 364
  • Neurology 97
  • Cell Biology 95
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 49
Replace F. C. Hollows with:
F. C. Hollows Australia
Tammy L. Yanovitch United States
Michael Stur Austria
Wilson J. Heriot Australia
John Bradbury United Kingdom
Birgitte Haargaard Denmark
Mehmet Çıtırık Türkiye
Barbara Giambene Italy
Yusuf Akar Türkiye
Levent Tök Türkiye
Stephen Charles relative to F. C. Hollows Australia F. C. Hollows's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.1×
F. C. Hollows · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Charles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Charles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Charles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Charles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Charles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Charles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Charles. The network helps show where Stephen Charles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Charles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Charles Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Charles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201899
2 199573
3 201171
4 201546
5 201336
6 200834
7 201730
8 201029
9 200128
10 201026
11 201525
12 201324
13 201720
14 199317
15 202216
16 202115
17 201713
18 200412
19 202311
20 202010

About Stephen Charles

Stephen Charles is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology and Neurology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 733 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal and Macular Surgery (15 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (12 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (5 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (445 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (364 citations), Neurology (97 citations), Cell Biology (95 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (49 citations). Stephen Charles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Niall Patton, Assad Jalil, Tsveta Ivanova, Paulo Stanga, Mahiul M. K. Muqit, Lorna B. Young, George Marcellino, David Henson, Carmen Baumann and Soon Wai Ch’ng. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Retina, Acta Ophthalmologica and Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact