David McLeod

5.2k citations
120 papers · 4.1k · h-index 39

Impact in

Papers in

David McLeod

118 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

David McLeod
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Ophthalmology 2.1k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.8k
  • Neurology 396
  • Immunology and Allergy 153
  • Cell Biology 221
Replace Stanley A. Vinores with:
Stanley A. Vinores United States
Ben S. Fine United States
Itzhak Hemo Israel
Elisabeth Rungger‐Brändle Switzerland
Atsushi Otani Japan
Yoshitaka Ohnishi Japan
Daniel Meller Germany
Masahito Ohji Japan
Klaus Rohrschneider Germany
Frank J. Lovicu Australia
David McLeod relative to Stanley A. Vinores United States Stanley A. Vinores's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Stanley A. Vinores · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David McLeod

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David McLeod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David McLeod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David McLeod more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David McLeod

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David McLeod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David McLeod. The network helps show where David McLeod may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David McLeod, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David McLeod Line = papers co-authored together David McLeod links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 120 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Retinal hypoxia in long-term diabetic cats.
1998216
2 1984192
3 1998167
4 1984141
5 2004136
6
Increased expression of placenta growth factor in proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
1998119
7 1997113
8 1977109
9 198093
10 199688
11 200080
12 199480
13 200577
14 200375
15 201567
16 199463
17 198463
18 199859
19 200154
20 200051

About David McLeod

David McLeod is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Cell Biology, having authored 120 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal and Macular Surgery (46 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (30 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (23 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (19 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (15 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (12 papers), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (10 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (2.1k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.8k citations), Neurology (396 citations), Immunology and Allergy (153 citations) and Cell Biology (221 citations). David McLeod has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Ian Grierson, M. Boulton, David Foreman, Paul Hiscott, Eva M. Kohner, Michael E. Boulton, Anthony Reardon, Asud Khaliq, John Jarvis-Evans and David Henson. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Eye, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Current Eye Research and Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact