David McLeod

5.2k citations
117 papers · 3.7k · h-index 37

Impact in

Papers in

David McLeod

116 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

David McLeod
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Ophthalmology 1.9k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.6k
  • Immunology and Allergy 147
  • Neurology 340
  • Cell Biology 207
Replace Ben S. Fine with:
Ben S. Fine United States
Yoshitaka Ohnishi Japan
Atsushi Otani Japan
Daniel Meller Germany
Frank J. Lovicu Australia
Klaus Rohrschneider Germany
Ronald C. Pruett United States
Coral G. Chamberlain Australia
A Churchill United Kingdom
Arif O. Khan Saudi Arabia
David McLeod relative to Ben S. Fine United States Ben S. Fine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ben S. Fine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David McLeod

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David McLeod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David McLeod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David McLeod more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David McLeod

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David McLeod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David McLeod. The network helps show where David McLeod may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David McLeod, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David McLeod Line = papers co-authored together David McLeod links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Retinal hypoxia in long-term diabetic cats.
1998200
2 1984181
3 1998155
4 1984129
5 2004122
6
Increased expression of placenta growth factor in proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
1998112
7 1997106
8 197798
9 199686
10 198083
11 199475
12 200072
13 200566
14 201565
15 200362
16 199459
17 199858
18 198456
19 200051
20
IL-10 and antibodies to TGF-beta2 and PDGF inhibit RPE-mediated retinal contraction.
200047

About David McLeod

David McLeod is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Cell Biology, having authored 117 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal and Macular Surgery (46 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (29 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (22 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (19 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (15 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (11 papers), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (10 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.9k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.6k citations), Immunology and Allergy (147 citations), Neurology (340 citations) and Cell Biology (207 citations). David McLeod has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include M. Boulton, Ian Grierson, David Foreman, Paul Hiscott, Eva M. Kohner, Michael E. Boulton, Asud Khaliq, Anthony Reardon, John Jarvis-Evans and David Henson. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Eye, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Current Eye Research and Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact