Stephen Baxter
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- John R. Elliott (3 shared papers)Jeremy Black (1 shared paper)Patrick Wormald (1 shared paper)David Chandler (1 shared paper)J. L. Price (1 shared paper)Carenza Lewis (1 shared paper)Herbert H. Rowen (2 shared papers)Frank Spooner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (19 papers)The William and Mary Quarterly (3 papers)The English Historical Review (2 papers)Acta Astronautica (2 papers)The Journal of Modern History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Stephen Baxter
44 papers receiving 138 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Classics 49
- History 106
- Museology 9
- Economics and Econometrics 54
- History and Philosophy of Science 9
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Baxter
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Baxter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Baxter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Baxter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Baxter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Baxter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Baxter. The network helps show where Stephen Baxter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Baxter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 17 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 3 | The Planetarium Hypothesis - A Resolution of the Fermi Paradox | 2001 | 14 |
| 4 | 1980 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1965 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 8 | |
| 11 | 1974 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1988 | 7 | |
| 14 | The development of the Treasury, 1660-1702 | 1957 | 7 |
| 15 | 1989 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1967 | 6 | |
| 17 | William III and the Defense of European Liberty, 1650-1702. | 1976 | 5 |
| 18 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1972 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 4 |
About Stephen Baxter
Stephen Baxter is a scholar working on History, Classics, Political Science and International Relations, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 57 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (11 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (8 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (7 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (6 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (5 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (4 papers), European Political History Analysis (4 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (49 citations), History (106 citations), Museology (9 citations), Economics and Econometrics (54 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (9 citations). Stephen Baxter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include John R. Elliott, Jeremy Black, Patrick Wormald, David Chandler, J. L. Price, Carenza Lewis, Herbert H. Rowen, Frank Spooner, Lewis Spitz and Julia Crick. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The William and Mary Quarterly, The English Historical Review, Acta Astronautica and The Journal of Modern History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.