Stephen B. King
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Hemoglobin structure and function
Papers in
-
- Ion channel regulation and function 1
-
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 2
- Co-authors
- William J. Rothwell (6 shared papers)Marsha King (2 shared papers)G.M. Benscoter (2 shared papers)Bruce Ganem (1 shared paper)M C Berman (1 shared paper)Ivan Azarov (1 shared paper)Jeanet Conradie (1 shared paper)Ryan G. Seibert (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)Nature Chemical Biology (1 paper)Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes (1 paper)Journal of Neurochemistry (1 paper)Antioxidants (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaEgypt
In The Last Decade
Stephen B. King
14 papers receiving 583 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
- Applied Psychology 40
- Cell Biology 114
- Biochemistry 50
- Computer Science Applications 34
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 14
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen B. King
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen B. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen B. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen B. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen B. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen B. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen B. King. The network helps show where Stephen B. King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen B. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1963 | 221 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 184 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 73 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 65 | |
| 5 | Human Performance Improvement: Building practitioner competence | 2000 | 26 |
| 6 | 1990 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1978 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 12 | Human Performance Improvement: Building Practitioner Performance | 2018 | 4 |
| 13 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 1 |
About Stephen B. King
Stephen B. King is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Cell Biology, Organic Chemistry and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 14 papers that have together received 662 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (1 paper), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (1 paper), Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting (1 paper), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (1 paper) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (40 citations), Cell Biology (114 citations), Biochemistry (50 citations), Computer Science Applications (34 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (14 citations). Stephen B. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include William J. Rothwell, Marsha King, G.M. Benscoter, Bruce Ganem, M C Berman, Ivan Azarov, Jeanet Conradie, Ryan G. Seibert, Rakesh P. Patel and Mark T. Gladwin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Nature Chemical Biology, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, Journal of Neurochemistry and Antioxidants.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.