Stephen Andrews

85 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Stephen Andrews
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Language and Linguistics 662
  • Linguistics and Language 278
  • Literature and Literary Theory 542
  • Reproductive Medicine 316
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 212
Replace David R. Cole with:
David R. Cole Australia
William M. Saunders United States
Rebecca Freeman United States
Akira Takada Japan
Scott L. Montgomery United States
John J. Collins United States
John Henderson United Kingdom
Michael J. Bell United Kingdom
John Henderson United States
Gu Li China
Stephen Andrews relative to David R. Cole Australia David R. Cole's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×50×106×
David R. Cole · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Andrews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Andrews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Andrews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Andrews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Andrews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Andrews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Andrews. The network helps show where Stephen Andrews may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Andrews, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Andrews Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Andrews links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993149
2 2003141
3 2015136
4 2007126
5 2016107
6 2001101
7 200798
8 201592
9 199976
10 199371
11 199470
12 200367
13 201355
14 201753
15 199952
16 199749
17 199448
18 201948
19 199841
20 201939

About Stephen Andrews

Stephen Andrews is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory and Linguistics and Language, having authored 89 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (27 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (19 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (18 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (18 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (17 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (11 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (662 citations), Linguistics and Language (278 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (542 citations), Reproductive Medicine (316 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (212 citations). Stephen Andrews has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Lucy J. Carpenter, Paul D. DePriest, John R. van Nagell, Holly H. Gallion, James E. Hunter, Douglas Shenson, Richard J. Kryscio, James Fanning, Edward J. Pavlik and Vivian E. von Gruenigen. Their work appears in journals such as Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Gynecologic Oncology, Language Awareness, Atmospheric measurement techniques and Environmental Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact