Stephanie Meyer

19 papers receiving 997 citations

Peers

Stephanie Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Occupational Therapy 680
  • Rehabilitation 237
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 181
  • Environmental Chemistry 56
  • Research and Theory 4
Replace Ashley Paul Akerman with:
Ashley Paul Akerman Canada
Marie‐Ludivine Château‐Degat Canada
Samuel J. Markello United States
Antonio A. René United States
Fotοula Babatsikou Greece
Claudia M. Toledo‐Corral United States
John W. Runyan United States
Linda Grievink Netherlands
Maryam Kazemi United States
Fiorino Mirabella Italy
Stephanie Meyer relative to Ashley Paul Akerman Canada Ashley Paul Akerman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×73×
Ashley Paul Akerman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Meyer. The network helps show where Stephanie Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephanie Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephanie Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Stephanie Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Results of the 2008-2009 International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey and a 3-year, acute care, unit-specific analysis.
2009307
2
Results of nine international pressure ulcer prevalence surveys: 1989 to 2005.
2008171
3 2016152
4 200986
5 201082
6 201365
7 200162
8 201441
9 202024
10 200020
11 202219
12 202116
13 201910
14 20186
15 19966
16 20195
17 20193
18 20133
19 20201
20 20240

About Stephanie Meyer

Stephanie Meyer is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, General Health Professions, Rehabilitation, Emergency Medical Services and Soil Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (5 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (2 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (2 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (2 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (680 citations), Rehabilitation (237 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (181 citations), Environmental Chemistry (56 citations) and Research and Theory (4 citations). Stephanie Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Catherine A. VanGilder, Gordon D. MacFarlane, Patrick T. Harrison, Stephanie Amlung, Charlie Lachenbruch, Jan Köhler, Sabine Hilt, Soren M. Brothers, Michael Liebman and Bruce A. Cameron. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Appetite, Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing, Journal of Chromatography A and Psychology and Sexuality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact