Psychology and Sexuality

477 papers and 6.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 477 papers published in Psychology and Sexuality in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychology and Sexuality usually cover Social Psychology (301 papers), Clinical Psychology (221 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (206 papers) specifically the topics of LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (277 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (167 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychology and Sexuality are Peter Hegarty, Ben Vincent, Sabra L. Katz‐Wise, Karen L. Blair, Rhea Ashley Hoskin, Y. Gávriel Ansara, Lisa Downing, Gloria Fraser, Katrina Roen and Janice Habarth.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychology and Sexuality

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychology and Sexuality. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychology and Sexuality.

Countries where authors publish in Psychology and Sexuality

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychology and Sexuality. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychology and Sexuality with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychology and Sexuality more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025