Stéphane Schicklin

12 papers receiving 214 citations

Peers

Stéphane Schicklin
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Molecular Medicine 63
  • Clinical Biochemistry 48
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 10
  • Endocrinology 23
  • Infectious Diseases 55
Replace Bhavya Chakrakodi with:
Bhavya Chakrakodi Sweden
Sushmita Sridhar United States
Maura Benson United States
Hayley R. Nordstrom United States
Camille Gomart France
Melicent C. Peck United States
Arun Decano South Korea
Brandon Eilertson United States
Youhua Yuan China
Amudhan Murugesan India
Stéphane Schicklin relative to Bhavya Chakrakodi Sweden Bhavya Chakrakodi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Bhavya Chakrakodi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stéphane Schicklin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stéphane Schicklin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stéphane Schicklin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stéphane Schicklin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stéphane Schicklin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stéphane Schicklin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stéphane Schicklin. The network helps show where Stéphane Schicklin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stéphane Schicklin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stéphane Schicklin Line = papers co-authored together Stéphane Schicklin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201745
2 201842
3 201926
4 201225
5 201624
6 201521
7 201614
8 201011
9 20085
10 20233
11 20182
12 20091
13 20260

About Stéphane Schicklin

Stéphane Schicklin is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 13 papers that have together received 219 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (5 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (4 papers), interferon and immune responses (2 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (2 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (2 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (2 papers), Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research (2 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (63 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (48 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (10 citations), Endocrinology (23 citations) and Infectious Diseases (55 citations). Stéphane Schicklin has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ghislaine Guigon, Jacques Schrenzel, Étienne Ruppé, Jean‐Baptiste Veyrieras, Nathalie Mugnier, Damien Baud, Jacqueline Marvel, Abdessalam Cherkaoui, Vladimir Lazarević and Yannick Charretier. Their work appears in journals such as Virus Research, Scientific Reports, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, In Silico Biology and The Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact