Sten Rüdiger

686 citations
26 papers · 476 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Sten Rüdiger

26 papers receiving 472 citations

Peers

Sten Rüdiger
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Modeling and Simulation 40
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 93
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 125
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 101
  • Computer Networks and Communications 71
Replace Stefan Reinker with:
Stefan Reinker Germany
Benjamin Pfeuty France
Preben Graae Sørensen Denmark
P. Érdi Hungary
Sune Danø Denmark
J. M. Wagner China
Philip Bittihn Germany
Avner Priel Israel
Helmut Schwegler Germany
Stefan Wils Belgium
Sten Rüdiger relative to Stefan Reinker Germany Stefan Reinker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Stefan Reinker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sten Rüdiger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sten Rüdiger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sten Rüdiger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sten Rüdiger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sten Rüdiger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sten Rüdiger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sten Rüdiger. The network helps show where Sten Rüdiger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sten Rüdiger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sten Rüdiger Line = papers co-authored together Sten Rüdiger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201536
2 201336
3 200934
4 201330
5 200728
6 201227
7 201825
8 201524
9 202023
10 201723
11 200022
12 202120
13 201519
14 201619
15 201617
16 201514
17 201313
18 201411
19 200411
20 200310

About Sten Rüdiger

Sten Rüdiger is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 26 papers that have together received 476 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (10 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (6 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers) and COVID-19 epidemiological studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (40 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (93 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (125 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (101 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (71 citations). Sten Rüdiger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and China. Frequent co-authors include Jianwei Shuai, Radek Erban, Jordi Soriano, Yandong Huang, Friedrich W. Johenning, Alexandre Hiroaki Kihara, F. Feudel, Mark B. Flegg, Pramod A. Pullarkat and Igor M. Sokolov. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS Computational Biology, Physics Reports, Molecular Neurobiology, Biophysical Journal and eNeuro.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact