Steffen Pistorius

1.2k citations
32 papers · 670 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Steffen Pistorius

32 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers

Steffen Pistorius
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 410
  • Gastroenterology 90
  • Oncology 236
  • Cancer Research 125
  • Rheumatology 44
Replace Makoto Eizuka with:
Makoto Eizuka Japan
Hirotoshi Yonemasu Japan
Margot G F van Lier Netherlands
W H Kim South Korea
Dietlinde Stienen Germany
T Aoki Japan
Alberto Achille Italy
J Girodet France
Victoria Beshay Australia
Anna Felisiak-Gołąbek Poland
Steffen Pistorius relative to Makoto Eizuka Japan Makoto Eizuka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Makoto Eizuka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steffen Pistorius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steffen Pistorius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steffen Pistorius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steffen Pistorius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steffen Pistorius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steffen Pistorius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steffen Pistorius. The network helps show where Steffen Pistorius may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steffen Pistorius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steffen Pistorius Line = papers co-authored together Steffen Pistorius links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002123
2 201473
3 200165
4 200052
5 200443
6 200343
7 199733
8 200329
9
Colorectal liver metastases: an update on palliative treatment options.
201225
10 200621
11 200619
12 201116
13 200616
14 200113
15
The putative tumor suppressor gene FHIT at 3p14.2 is rarely affected by loss of heterozygosity in primary human brain tumors.
199712
16 200312
17 200011
18 200110
19 20049
20 20017

About Steffen Pistorius

Steffen Pistorius is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 670 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (21 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (8 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (6 papers), Digestive system and related health (4 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (4 papers), Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (3 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (410 citations), Gastroenterology (90 citations), Oncology (236 citations), Cancer Research (125 citations) and Rheumatology (44 citations). Steffen Pistorius has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Hans K. Schackert, Jens Plaschke, H. D. Saeger, Stefan Krüger, Hans‐Detlev Saeger, F Theissig, Christian Sutter, Karsten Schulmann, Bettina Burger and Siegfried Uhlhaas. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Letters, International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Human Mutation, European Journal of Cancer and International Journal of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact