Michael Nagel

46 papers receiving 817 citations

Peers

Michael Nagel
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Hepatology 182
  • Epidemiology 211
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 18
  • Endocrinology 21
  • Education 111
Replace Rebecca Siegel with:
Rebecca Siegel United States
Carla Johnson United States
Chelsea Gill Australia
Kirsty Lee Hong Kong
Marie Karlsson Sweden
Andrew Armstrong United States
Susan Powell United Kingdom
Nadine Chan United States
Hsin‐Hui Wang Taiwan
Jingyi Fan China
Michael Nagel relative to Rebecca Siegel United States Rebecca Siegel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×37×
Rebecca Siegel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Nagel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Nagel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Nagel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Nagel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Nagel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Nagel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Nagel. The network helps show where Michael Nagel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Nagel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Nagel Line = papers co-authored together Michael Nagel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Newcastle disease virus-infected intact autologous tumor cell vaccine for adjuvant active specific immunotherapy of resected colorectal carcinoma.
1996108
2 200294
3 201979
4
Teaching: Making a Difference
201079
5 201874
6 201339
7 200533
8 202031
9 202030
10 201225
11 202124
12 202223
13 201418
14 200016
15 200416
16 202214
17 201113
18 200011
19
In the Beginning: The Brain, Early Development and Learning
201211
20 200410

About Michael Nagel

Michael Nagel is a scholar working on Hepatology, Surgery, Epidemiology, Education and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 51 papers that have together received 870 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver Disease and Transplantation (10 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (4 papers), Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (3 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers), Hepatitis C virus research (2 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (182 citations), Epidemiology (211 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (18 citations), Endocrinology (21 citations) and Education (111 citations). Michael Nagel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter R. Galle, Jörn M. Schattenberg, Christian Labenz, M. D. Sacristán, Jutta Ludwig‐Müller, Johannes Siemens, Marcus‐Alexander Wörns, Maurice Stephan Michel, Yvonne Huber and Wolfgang Maximilian Kremer. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology, Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, International Journal of Colorectal Disease, PLoS ONE and Hepatology Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact