Simon Byrne

510 citations
30 papers · 339 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Simon Byrne

28 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

Simon Byrne
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Clinical Psychology 145
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 86
  • Applied Psychology 30
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 12
  • Social Psychology 63
Replace Lotte Theuwis with:
Lotte Theuwis Belgium
Jolene Jacquart United States
Simon Neumer Germany
Bálint Andó Hungary
Zoey A. Shaw United States
G. Camelia Adams Canada
Nayra A Martin-Key United Kingdom
Jaclyn S. Kirshenbaum United States
Yuliya Kotelnikova Canada
María Balle Spain
Simon Byrne relative to Lotte Theuwis Belgium Lotte Theuwis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lotte Theuwis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Byrne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Byrne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Byrne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Byrne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Byrne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Byrne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Byrne. The network helps show where Simon Byrne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simon Byrne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Byrne Line = papers co-authored together Simon Byrne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201845
2 201734
3 202129
4 201929
5 201527
6 201825
7 201721
8 201119
9 201812
10 200811
11 201910
12 20239
13 20118
14 20158
15 20216
16 20146
17 20175
18 20205
19 20165
20 20175

About Simon Byrne

Simon Byrne is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (6 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (145 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (86 citations), Applied Psychology (30 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (12 citations) and Social Psychology (63 citations). Simon Byrne has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul Haber, Andrew Baillie, Kirsten C. Morley, Ronald M. Rapee, Robert H. Pietrzak, Steven M. Southwick, Helena J. V. Rutherford, Michael J. Crowley, Lara J. Farrell and Vincent J. Fogliati. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Depression and Anxiety, Journal of Child and Family Studies, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal and Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact