Shin‐Ping Lin
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 2%
- Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
Papers in
- Biomaterials 23
- Advanced Cellulose Research Studies 19
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications 5
- Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging 3
-
- Biofuel production and bioconversion 8
- 3D Printing in Biomedical Research 4
- Co-authors
- Kuan‐Chen Cheng (37 shared papers)Kai-Di Hsu (7 shared papers)Hsien‐Yi Hsu (13 shared papers)Shella Permatasari Santoso (25 shared papers)Jui‐Ming Liu (3 shared papers)Chang‐Wei Hsieh (14 shared papers)Yuwen Ting (5 shared papers)Chun-Nan Wu (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Shin‐Ping Lin
43 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Biomaterials 650
- Rehabilitation 128
- Biotechnology 139
- Molecular Medicine 52
- Food Science 144
Countries citing papers authored by Shin‐Ping Lin
This map shows the geographic impact of Shin‐Ping Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shin‐Ping Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shin‐Ping Lin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shin‐Ping Lin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shin‐Ping Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shin‐Ping Lin. The network helps show where Shin‐Ping Lin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shin‐Ping Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 194 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 160 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 93 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 70 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 59 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 59 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 47 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 45 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 45 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 43 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 41 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 35 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 27 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 27 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 26 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 26 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 20 |
About Shin‐Ping Lin
Shin‐Ping Lin is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering, Plant Science, Food Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Cellulose Research Studies (19 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (10 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (8 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (5 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (5 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (4 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (4 papers) and Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (650 citations), Rehabilitation (128 citations), Biotechnology (139 citations), Molecular Medicine (52 citations) and Food Science (144 citations). Shin‐Ping Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Indonesia and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Kuan‐Chen Cheng, Kai-Di Hsu, Hsien‐Yi Hsu, Shella Permatasari Santoso, Jui‐Ming Liu, Chang‐Wei Hsieh, Yuwen Ting, Chun-Nan Wu, Kuan-Chen Cheng and Felycia Edi Soetaredjo. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Cellulose, Molecules, Fermentation and Antioxidants.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.