Sherwin Kuo

934 citations
8 papers · 726 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing 2
    • Gene expression and cancer classification 1
    • Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects 3
    • Dermatology and Skin Diseases 2

Sherwin Kuo

8 papers receiving 703 citations

Peers

Sherwin Kuo
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Dermatology 370
  • Immunology and Allergy 40
  • Molecular Medicine 30
  • Microbiology 36
  • Rehabilitation 29
Replace Geoffrey D. Hannigan with:
Geoffrey D. Hannigan United States
Nathan B. Pincus United States
María-José Fábrega Spain
Han Song China
Junghyun Hwang South Korea
Tsutomu Ushijima Japan
M. Rachid Argentina
C. E. JONES United Kingdom
Emma Barnard United Kingdom
Edris Nabizadeh Iran
Sherwin Kuo relative to Geoffrey D. Hannigan United States Geoffrey D. Hannigan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Geoffrey D. Hannigan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sherwin Kuo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sherwin Kuo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sherwin Kuo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sherwin Kuo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sherwin Kuo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sherwin Kuo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sherwin Kuo. The network helps show where Sherwin Kuo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sherwin Kuo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sherwin Kuo Line = papers co-authored together Sherwin Kuo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2013237
2 2013236
3 199076
4 201464
5 201351
6 201651
7 19879
8 20122

About Sherwin Kuo

Sherwin Kuo is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Dermatology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Food Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 726 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects (3 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (2 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (2 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (2 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (2 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (1 paper), Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper) and Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (370 citations), Immunology and Allergy (40 citations), Molecular Medicine (30 citations), Microbiology (36 citations) and Rehabilitation (29 citations). Sherwin Kuo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard L. Gallo, Chun‐Ming Huang, Jinghua Yu, Yanhan Wang, Aimee Two, Alvin B. Coda, Yong Jiang, Stephen Huang, David P. Speert and R K Selander. Their work appears in journals such as Infection and Immunity, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Scientific Reports, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Current Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact