Shekar Bose

52 papers receiving 540 citations

Peers

Shekar Bose
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 135
  • Business and International Management 31
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46
  • Economics and Econometrics 141
  • Global and Planetary Change 109
Replace Conrado M. Gempesaw with:
Conrado M. Gempesaw United States
R. Wes Harrison United States
Elizabeth M. Nussbaumer United States
Andrew Muhammad United States
Luigi Bollani Italy
Yaw Osei-Asare Ghana
Ricardo Hernández United States
Christian Elleby Spain
Bülent Mìran Türkiye
Jeff Luckstead United States
Shekar Bose relative to Conrado M. Gempesaw United States Conrado M. Gempesaw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.9×
Conrado M. Gempesaw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shekar Bose

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shekar Bose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shekar Bose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shekar Bose more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shekar Bose

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shekar Bose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shekar Bose. The network helps show where Shekar Bose may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Shekar Bose, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shekar Bose Line = papers co-authored together Shekar Bose links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199657
2 201639
3 201536
4 201433
5 201631
6 200027
7 201226
8 200223
9 200821
10 201821
11 201918
12 201816
13 201616
14 201314
15 200313
16 201512
17 201911
18 201611
19 201811
20 201011

About Shekar Bose

Shekar Bose is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 54 papers that have together received 587 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and fisheries research (10 papers), Natural Resources and Economic Development (10 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (7 papers), Global trade and economics (6 papers), Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (6 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (4 papers) and Agricultural Innovations and Practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (135 citations), Business and International Management (31 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (46 citations), Economics and Econometrics (141 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (109 citations). Shekar Bose has collaborated with scholars based in Oman, Australia and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Alistair McIlgorm, David Jukes, Moza Al‐Busaidi, Houcine Boughanmi, Michel R. Claereboudt, Manjula Tiwari, A. Govender, Gholam R. Amin, H. F. Campbell and Slim Zekri. Their work appears in journals such as Marine Policy, Food Control, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Journal of Physical Activity and Health and British Journal Of Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact