Sheila Smith

71 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Sheila Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Health 549
  • Research and Theory 34
  • Gender Studies 261
  • Clinical Psychology 488
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 16
Replace Robbie Davis‐Floyd with:
Robbie Davis‐Floyd United States
Hélène Berman Canada
Robert H. Coombs United States
Blye Frank Canada
Hadass Goldblatt Israel
Kaysi Eastlick Kushner Canada
Lea Tufford Canada
Srinika Jayaratne United States
Margaret Treacy Ireland
Renée R. Anspach United States
Sheila Smith relative to Robbie Davis‐Floyd United States Robbie Davis‐Floyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Robbie Davis‐Floyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sheila Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sheila Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheila Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheila Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sheila Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheila Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheila Smith. The network helps show where Sheila Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sheila Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sheila Smith Line = papers co-authored together Sheila Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005227
2 1985131
3 2004110
4 2002100
5 200596
6 200488
7
Effectiveness of Integrated Simulation and Clinical Experiences Compared to Traditional Clinical Experiences for Nursing Students.
201662
8 201954
9 201750
10 202244
11 199644
12 198942
13 201638
14 198938
15 200329
16 202327
17 201925
18 202224
19 200723
20 201222

About Sheila Smith

Sheila Smith is a scholar working on Education, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Early Childhood Education and Development (21 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (10 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (10 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (9 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (6 papers), Sex work and related issues (5 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (5 papers) and Nursing education and management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (549 citations), Research and Theory (34 citations), Gender Studies (261 citations), Clinical Psychology (488 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (16 citations). Sheila Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Iva Hall, Elizabeth Batten, Ann Malecha, Kathy Watson, Julia Gist, Judith McFarlane, James W. Stigler, Jessica Dym Bartlett, Maureen A. Pirog‐Good and Lewis H. Margolis. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Nursing Outlook, Journal of Nursing Education, American Journal of Public Health and AACN Advanced Critical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact