Shaul Tor

478 citations
16 papers · 49 · h-index 4

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Anthropology top 10%
    • Classical Antiquity Studies

Papers in

    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 10
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 1
    • Classical Antiquity Studies 4
Journals
Phronesis (5 papers)The Journal of Hellenic Studies (1 paper)Cambridge University Press eBooks (2 papers)Research Portal (King's College London) (4 papers)
Partner nations
United Kingdom

In The Last Decade

Shaul Tor

10 papers receiving 42 citations

Peers

Shaul Tor
Comparison fields: 5 of 9
  • Philosophy 40
  • Anthropology 29
  • Archeology 23
  • Religious studies 5
  • History and Philosophy of Science 3
Replace Gerd Van Riel with:
Gerd Van Riel Belgium
Jan Opsomer Belgium
Barbara M. Sattler United Kingdom
Klaus Corcilius Germany
Wayne J. Hankey Canada
Robert Lamberton
Riccardo Chiaradonna Italy
David Sedley United States
Luuk Huitink Netherlands
Allan Silverman United States
Shaul Tor relative to Gerd Van Riel Belgium Gerd Van Riel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gerd Van Riel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shaul Tor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shaul Tor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shaul Tor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shaul Tor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shaul Tor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shaul Tor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shaul Tor. The network helps show where Shaul Tor may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201720
2 20179
3 20146
4 20145
5 20133
6
Argument and signification in Sextus Empiricus: Against the Mathematicians VIII 289-290
20102
7 20221
8
Heat, Pneuma and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Medicine
20171
9
Argument and signification in Sextus Empiricus
20101
10
On second thoughts, does nature like to hide? Heraclitus B123 reconsidered
20171
11 20260
12 20230
13 20240
14 20210
15
Belief and its Alternatives in Greek and Roman Religion
20170
16 20240

About Shaul Tor

Shaul Tor is a scholar working on Philosophy, Anthropology, Archeology, History and Philosophy of Science and Religious studies, having authored 16 papers that have together received 49 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (10 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (1 paper) and Historical Studies in Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (40 citations), Anthropology (29 citations), Archeology (23 citations), Religious studies (5 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (3 citations). Shaul Tor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Their work appears in journals such as Phronesis, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Cambridge University Press eBooks and Research Portal (King's College London).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact