The Journal of Hellenic Studies

1.6k papers and 7.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in The Journal of Hellenic Studies in the last decades have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of Hellenic Studies usually cover Anthropology (1.1k papers), Archeology (805 papers) and Philosophy (240 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (1.0k papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (350 papers) and Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (315 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Hellenic Studies are Paul Halstead, Simon Goldhill, D. M. Lewis, Richard Seaford, Keith Sidwell, M. L. West, John Gould, Jasper Griffin, Anthony Snodgrass and G. E. R. Lloyd.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Hellenic Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Hellenic Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Hellenic Studies.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Hellenic Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Hellenic Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Hellenic Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Hellenic Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025