Shaoping Wu

2.8k citations
69 papers · 2.4k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Shaoping Wu

68 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Shaoping Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Biotechnology 235
  • Biochemistry 185
  • Spectroscopy 281
  • Endocrinology 72
  • Molecular Biology 956
Replace Masafumi Noda with:
Masafumi Noda Japan
Rolf W. Hartmann Germany
Sebastian Salentin Germany
Debprasad Chattopadhyay India
Jing Lin China
Bruno Botta Italy
Toshiaki Sunazuka Japan
William J. Christ United States
Paul W. Groundwater United Kingdom
Sonsoles Martín‐Santamaría Spain
Shaoping Wu relative to Masafumi Noda Japan Masafumi Noda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Masafumi Noda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shaoping Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shaoping Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shaoping Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shaoping Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shaoping Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shaoping Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shaoping Wu. The network helps show where Shaoping Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shaoping Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shaoping Wu Line = papers co-authored together Shaoping Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015201
2 2014180
3 2019171
4 2014164
5 2014135
6 2010117
7 201694
8 201683
9 201969
10 201066
11 201061
12 201255
13 201347
14 201847
15 201046
16 201143
17 202042
18 201842
19 201941
20 202238

About Shaoping Wu

Shaoping Wu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Biochemistry, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (9 papers), Sulfur Compounds in Biology (7 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (7 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (6 papers), Gut microbiota and health (5 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (5 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (5 papers) and Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (235 citations), Biochemistry (185 citations), Spectroscopy (281 citations), Endocrinology (72 citations) and Molecular Biology (956 citations). Shaoping Wu has collaborated with scholars based in China, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jun Sun, Yinglin Xia, Rong Lu, Yong-guo Zhang, Xingyin Liu, Yongmin Zhang, Hui Dong, Zefeng Zhao, Jianli Li and Dapeng Jin. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, Gastroenterology, American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact