Medicinal Chemistry Research

4.3k papers and 54.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.3k papers published in Medicinal Chemistry Research in the last decades have received a total of 54.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Medicinal Chemistry Research usually cover Organic Chemistry (2.5k papers), Molecular Biology (1.7k papers) and Pharmacology (679 papers) specifically the topics of Synthesis and biological activity (1.6k papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (650 papers) and Computational Drug Discovery Methods (605 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medicinal Chemistry Research are Łukasz Popiołek, Balasubramanian Narasimhan, Pradeep Kumar, Pradeep Mishra, Chander Mohan, Monika Gaba, Deepika Sharma, Nisheeth C. Desai, Manish P. Patel and Taîbi Ben Hadda.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Medicinal Chemistry Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Medicinal Chemistry Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medicinal Chemistry Research.

Countries where authors publish in Medicinal Chemistry Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medicinal Chemistry Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medicinal Chemistry Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medicinal Chemistry Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025