Scott Windeatt

1.1k citations
14 papers · 714 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Windeatt

13 papers receiving 509 citations

Peers

Scott Windeatt
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Communication 107
  • Language and Linguistics 116
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Literature and Literary Theory 75
  • Information Systems and Management 41
Replace Leo R. Lentz with:
Leo R. Lentz Netherlands
David Eastment
Gabriela Grosseck Romania
Tom Dobrowolski United Kingdom
Richard Withey United Kingdom
Carmen Holotescu Romania
William A. Belson United Kingdom
Misa Matsuda Japan
John Pettit United Kingdom
Yuchun Zhou United States
Scott Windeatt relative to Leo R. Lentz Netherlands Leo R. Lentz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Leo R. Lentz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Windeatt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Windeatt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Windeatt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Windeatt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Windeatt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Windeatt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Windeatt. The network helps show where Scott Windeatt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Scott Windeatt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Windeatt Line = papers co-authored together Scott Windeatt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1
The Internet
2000542
2 201072
3 198933
4 201920
5 201619
6 20219
7 20217
8
Teacher training in computer-assisted language learning: voices of teacher educators
20175
9 20122
10
Challenges in specifying and evaluating a conceptual design for a task-based mini-game environment for language learning
20122
11
A teacher's framework for online English for academic purposes courses
20181
12 20241
13 20231
14 19880

About Scott Windeatt

Scott Windeatt is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Computer Science Applications, having authored 14 papers that have together received 714 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Second Language Learning and Teaching (8 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (8 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Online and Blended Learning (2 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (2 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (2 papers) and Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (107 citations), Language and Linguistics (116 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (75 citations) and Information Systems and Management (41 citations). Scott Windeatt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include David Eastment, Andrew Littlejohn, Jeong‐Bae Son, Frederik Cornillie and Piet Desmet. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Assisted Language Learning, International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, System, International Journal of English Studies and Language Teaching Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact