Scott Waldron

77 papers receiving 726 citations

Peers

Scott Waldron
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 235
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 85
  • Business and International Management 16
  • Forestry 25
Replace Simon Anderson with:
Simon Anderson United Kingdom
R.A. Jongeneel Netherlands
John Ikerd United States
Berkeley Hill United Kingdom
Lokman Zaibet Oman
Martin K. Luckert Canada
John Mburu Kenya
Francisco Areal United Kingdom
Lori Ann Thrupp United States
Daði Már Kristófersson Iceland
Scott Waldron relative to Simon Anderson United Kingdom Simon Anderson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Simon Anderson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Waldron

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Waldron's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Waldron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Waldron more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Waldron

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Waldron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Waldron. The network helps show where Scott Waldron may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Waldron, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Waldron Line = papers co-authored together Scott Waldron links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201265
2 201061
3 200846
4 200242
5 202142
6 202136
7 201034
8 201034
9 201431
10 200630
11
Beef in China: Agribusiness Opportunities and Challenges
200127
12 201423
13 201222
14 200921
15 201620
16 201919
17 201718
18 201116
19 202213
20 202312

About Scott Waldron

Scott Waldron is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Agronomy and Crop Science, Strategy and Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 89 papers that have together received 820 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (21 papers), Marine and Coastal Ecosystems (10 papers), Livestock Farming and Management (9 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (8 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (7 papers), Rural development and sustainability (6 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (6 papers) and Global trade and economics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (235 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (125 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (85 citations), Business and International Management (16 citations) and Forestry (25 citations). Scott Waldron has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Colin G. Brown, John W. Longworth, Alexandra Langford, Jing Zhang, Adam M. Komarek, Colin D. Brown, Jocelyn Davies, Colin Brown, Margaret H. Friedel and Dingtao Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Food Policy, China Agricultural Economic Review, Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, Foods and Marine Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact