China Agricultural Economic Review

619 papers and 9.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 619 papers published in China Agricultural Economic Review in the last decades have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations. Papers published in China Agricultural Economic Review usually cover Economics and Econometrics (300 papers), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (179 papers) and Soil Science (135 papers) specifically the topics of Agricultural Innovations and Practices (94 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (86 papers) and China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in China Agricultural Economic Review are Xiwen Chen, Jikun Huang, Xiaohua Yu, Yuheng Li, Wanglin Ma, H. Holly Wang, Awudu Abdulai, Yi Che, Yansui Liu and Scott Rozelle.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in China Agricultural Economic Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in China Agricultural Economic Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in China Agricultural Economic Review.

Countries where authors publish in China Agricultural Economic Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in China Agricultural Economic Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in China Agricultural Economic Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites China Agricultural Economic Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025