Scott Pitnick

8.8k citations
83 papers · 5.9k · h-index 42

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Pitnick

83 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Peers

Scott Pitnick
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 4.8k
  • Genetics 3.5k
  • Insect Science 920
  • Reproductive Medicine 366
  • Ecology 869
Replace Tommaso Pizzari with:
Tommaso Pizzari United Kingdom
Rhonda R. Snook United Kingdom
Nina Wedell United Kingdom
Judith E. Mank United Kingdom
Matthew J. G. Gage United Kingdom
Stuart Wigby United Kingdom
Paul I. Ward Switzerland
Andrew Pomiankowski United Kingdom
Stefan Lüpold Switzerland
Leo W. Beukeboom Netherlands
Scott Pitnick relative to Tommaso Pizzari United Kingdom Tommaso Pizzari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Tommaso Pizzari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Pitnick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Pitnick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Pitnick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Pitnick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Pitnick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Pitnick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Pitnick. The network helps show where Scott Pitnick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Pitnick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Pitnick Line = papers co-authored together Scott Pitnick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002376
2 1999284
3 2010277
4
Sperm biology : an evolutionary perspective
2009265
5 1995253
6 1996222
7 1994217
8 2007206
9 2002192
10 2001181
11 2010161
12 2011146
13 2005141
14 1991135
15 1999122
16 2012118
17 2003116
18 2016114
19 2012109
20 1994103

About Scott Pitnick

Scott Pitnick is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science, Reproductive Medicine and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 83 papers that have together received 5.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (66 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (57 papers), Plant and animal studies (55 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (5 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (5 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (4 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (4.8k citations), Genetics (3.5k citations), Insect Science (920 citations), Reproductive Medicine (366 citations) and Ecology (869 citations). Scott Pitnick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Therese A. Markow, Gary T. Miller, Greg S. Spicer, Stefan Lüpold, Mollie K. Manier, John M. Belote, T. R. Birkhead, Adam Bjork, Dawn M. Higginson and David J. Hosken. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The American Naturalist and Animal Behaviour.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact