Scott Moser

659 citations
10 papers · 465 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research 7
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 2
    • Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies 2
    • Biosensors and Analytical Detection 2
    • Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks 2

Scott Moser

8 papers receiving 446 citations

Peers

Scott Moser
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Food Science 204
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 117
  • Biophysics 31
  • Molecular Biology 307
  • Biotechnology 31
Replace Toshinori Igarashi with:
Toshinori Igarashi Japan
Bartłomiej Dziuba Poland
Dawn P. Fowler United Kingdom
Hervé Guillemin France
Hiroko Tsutsumi Japan
Ken Ukibe Japan
Pedro A. Alvarez Canada
Rohan G. Kroll United Kingdom
J. Cobo Spain
Jaap M Evers New Zealand
Scott Moser relative to Toshinori Igarashi Japan Toshinori Igarashi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Toshinori Igarashi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Moser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Moser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Moser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Moser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Moser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Moser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Moser. The network helps show where Scott Moser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Scott Moser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Moser Line = papers co-authored together Scott Moser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2001177
2 2001114
3 200385
4 200641
5 200725
6 201218
7 20063
8 20111
9 20081
10
Integrated circuit biosensors using living whole-cell bioreporters
20070

About Scott Moser

Scott Moser is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Biophysics, Food Science and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 10 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (7 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers), Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks (2 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (2 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (204 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (117 citations), Biophysics (31 citations), Molecular Biology (307 citations) and Biotechnology (31 citations). Scott Moser has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dwayne C. Savage, Christopher A. Elkins, Gary S. Sayler, Michael L. Simpson, Timothy E. McKnight, David E. Nivens, Steven Ripp, Benjamin J. Blalock, Syed K. Islam and S.C. Terry. Their work appears in journals such as Microbiology, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, Journal of Applied Microbiology, Biosensors and Bioelectronics and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact