Scott M. Thomas

28 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Scott M. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Research and Theory 10
  • Gender Studies 54
  • General Health Professions 90
  • Health Informatics 5
  • Leadership and Management 3
Replace Reema Safadi with:
Reema Safadi Jordan
J.P. Dupeyron France
Sally A. Arif United States
Dana Sall United States
Hart Lg United States
Sarah A. Nisly United States
Vincent C. Dennis United States
Julien Dedier United States
Newton Addo United States
Christine Nguyen United States
Scott M. Thomas relative to Reema Safadi Jordan Reema Safadi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Reema Safadi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott M. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott M. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott M. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott M. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott M. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott M. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott M. Thomas. The network helps show where Scott M. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott M. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott M. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Scott M. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200683
2 200749
3 201147
4 201242
5 201336
6 200734
7 200427
8 200926
9
The effect of simulation training on PALS skills among family medicine residents.
201121
10 200519
11 201219
12 199312
13 200611
14 202110
15 19957
16 20187
17 20053
18 20033
19 19993
20 20152

About Scott M. Thomas

Scott M. Thomas is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Surgery, Analytical Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (4 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers) and Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (10 citations), Gender Studies (54 citations), General Health Professions (90 citations), Health Informatics (5 citations) and Leadership and Management (3 citations). Scott M. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Oscar A. Cruz, Mohsen Shabahang, Carey S. Ryan, Martin S. Greenberg, Laura Browning, Christopher Pole, Bobbie Ann Adair White, James Gerard, Mark Sadoski and Anthony J. Scalzo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, Organic Process Research & Development, Ophthalmology, Pediatric Emergency Care and Pediatric Critical Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact