Scott Hobson

18 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

Scott Hobson
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 93
  • Physiology 63
  • Biological Psychiatry 6
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 38
  • Molecular Biology 121
Replace Philip J. Welsby with:
Philip J. Welsby United Kingdom
Claudia Albrecht Germany
Yoonju Kim South Korea
James M. Seckler United States
Julian A. Schreiber Germany
Timothy H. Pruess United States
Tim Sonntag United States
Moëz Bali United States
Travis J. Morgenstern United States
Rachel E. Lackie Canada
Scott Hobson relative to Philip J. Welsby United Kingdom Philip J. Welsby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Philip J. Welsby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Hobson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Hobson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Hobson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Hobson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Hobson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Hobson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Hobson. The network helps show where Scott Hobson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Hobson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Hobson Line = papers co-authored together Scott Hobson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200956
2 201052
3 200034
4 201830
5 201622
6 199113
7 201810
8 20106
9 20204
10 20174
11 20152
12 20182
13 20182
14 19902
15 20222
16 19851
17 20161
18 20151
19 20240

About Scott Hobson

Scott Hobson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Physiology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 244 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (93 citations), Physiology (63 citations), Biological Psychiatry (6 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (38 citations) and Molecular Biology (121 citations). Scott Hobson has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Holger Rosenbrock, Marc A. Grundl, Klaus G. Reymann, Matthias Grauert, Ulrich H. Schröder, Eliza Koroś, Karlheinz Baumann, Birgit Dümpelfeld, Thomas Luebbers and Carsten Hopf. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Behavioral Neuroscience, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Biological Psychiatry and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact