Scott Fleming

84 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Scott Fleming
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Computer Science Applications 310
  • Software 171
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 502
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 237
  • Gender Studies 231
Replace Konstantinos Chorianopoulos with:
Konstantinos Chorianopoulos Greece
Harold F. O’Neil United States
Regina Vollmeyer Germany
Stephen M. Alessi United States
Juan E. Gilbert United States
Raymond W. Kulhavy United States
Luca Botturi Switzerland
Baltasar Fernández‐Manjón Spain
Wim Westera Netherlands
Walter Dick United States
Scott Fleming relative to Konstantinos Chorianopoulos Greece Konstantinos Chorianopoulos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.2×
Konstantinos Chorianopoulos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Fleming

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Fleming's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Fleming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Fleming more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Fleming

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Fleming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Fleming. The network helps show where Scott Fleming may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Fleming, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Fleming Line = papers co-authored together Scott Fleming links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010140
2 2010102
3 201699
4 200080
5 201074
6 201169
7 201066
8 200964
9 201357
10 201454
11 201045
12 201342
13 201240
14 200638
15 201435
16 201134
17 201133
18 201531
19 201331
20 201429

About Scott Fleming

Scott Fleming is a scholar working on Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (23 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (14 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (14 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (13 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (12 papers), Physical Education and Pedagogy (11 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (8 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (310 citations), Software (171 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (502 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (237 citations) and Gender Studies (231 citations). Scott Fleming has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Sheldon Hanton, Margaret Burnett, Denise M. Hill, Nic Matthews, Rachel Bellamy, Kyle Rector, Austin Z. Henley, Daniel F. Gucciardi, David Piorkowski and Lew Hardy. Their work appears in journals such as The Sport Psychologist, Interacting with Computers, Journal of Further and Higher Education, European Physical Education Review and International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact