Scott Fleming

90 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Scott Fleming
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Computer Science Applications 319
  • Software 184
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 535
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 250
  • Gender Studies 258
Replace Konstantinos Chorianopoulos with:
Konstantinos Chorianopoulos Greece
Harold F. O’Neil United States
Regina Vollmeyer Germany
Stephen M. Alessi United States
Brent Bridgeman United States
John Rooksby United Kingdom
Luca Botturi Switzerland
Raymond W. Kulhavy United States
Wim Westera Netherlands
James Dalziel Australia
Scott Fleming relative to Konstantinos Chorianopoulos Greece Konstantinos Chorianopoulos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.7×
Konstantinos Chorianopoulos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Fleming

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Fleming's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Fleming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Fleming more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Fleming

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Fleming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Fleming. The network helps show where Scott Fleming may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Fleming, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Fleming Line = papers co-authored together Scott Fleming links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010149
2 2016105
3 2010105
4 200084
5 201079
6 201175
7 200970
8 201066
9 201358
10 201455
11 201052
12 201344
13 201244
14 201440
15 200639
16 201134
17 201134
18 201531
19 201331
20
Leisure cultures : investigations in sport, media and technology
200330

About Scott Fleming

Scott Fleming is a scholar working on Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 94 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (24 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (14 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (14 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (14 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (13 papers), Physical Education and Pedagogy (12 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (8 papers) and Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (319 citations), Software (184 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (535 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (250 citations) and Gender Studies (258 citations). Scott Fleming has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Sheldon Hanton, Margaret Burnett, Denise M. Hill, Nic Matthews, Rachel Bellamy, Kyle Rector, Daniel F. Gucciardi, Austin Z. Henley, David Piorkowski and Mike McNamee. Their work appears in journals such as The Sport Psychologist, Journal of Further and Higher Education, European Physical Education Review, Interacting with Computers and International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact