Mike McNamee

149 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Mike McNamee
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Applied Psychology 172
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.2k
  • Gender Studies 242
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 103
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 194
Replace Ansgar Thiel with:
Ansgar Thiel Germany
Lynda B. Ransdell United States
Anna van Wersch United Kingdom
Ivanka Prichard Australia
James A. Dimmock Australia
Peter R. Giacobbi United States
Kevin S. Masters United States
Philip Sullivan Canada
Daniel J. Madigan United Kingdom
Vikki Krane United States
Mike McNamee relative to Ansgar Thiel Germany Ansgar Thiel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Ansgar Thiel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mike McNamee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mike McNamee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike McNamee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike McNamee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mike McNamee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike McNamee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike McNamee. The network helps show where Mike McNamee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mike McNamee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mike McNamee Line = papers co-authored together Mike McNamee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 160 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010113
2 200894
3 200876
4 199273
5 202361
6 200053
7 201053
8 200648
9 199545
10
Elite sport, doping and public health
200941
11 201639
12 201238
13 200038
14 200637
15 201137
16 200533
17 201532
18 201431
19 201030
20 200429

About Mike McNamee

Mike McNamee is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cognitive Neuroscience and Gender Studies, having authored 160 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Doping in Sports (83 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (17 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (14 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (11 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (11 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (10 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (10 papers) and Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (172 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.2k citations), Gender Studies (242 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (103 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (194 citations). Mike McNamee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Bloodworth, Sigmund Loland, Steven D. Edwards, Richard Bailey, Silvia Camporesi, Scott Fleming, Carwyn Jones, Andrea Petróczi, Gemma Pearce and John Votto. Their work appears in journals such as Sport Ethics and Philosophy, Leisure Studies, European Journal of Sport Science, British Journal of Sports Medicine and Journal of Medical Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact