Scott E. Feeder
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
Papers in
-
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 4
-
- Vitamin D Research Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Mark A. Frye (7 shared papers)Joanna M. Biernacka (4 shared papers)Doo‐Sup Choi (2 shared papers)Gregory A. Poland (2 shared papers)Simon Kung (1 shared paper)Brian A. Palmer (1 shared paper)Malik Nassan (2 shared papers)G. Douglas Jenkins (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Affective Disorders (2 papers)Sleep Medicine (1 paper)Journal of Psychiatric Research (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (1 paper)Translational Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandTürkiye
In The Last Decade
Scott E. Feeder
9 papers receiving 160 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Biological Psychiatry 30
- Health Informatics 5
- Psychiatry and Mental health 41
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 28
- Behavioral Neuroscience 5
Countries citing papers authored by Scott E. Feeder
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott E. Feeder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott E. Feeder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott E. Feeder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott E. Feeder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott E. Feeder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott E. Feeder. The network helps show where Scott E. Feeder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott E. Feeder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 56 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 2 |
About Scott E. Feeder
Scott E. Feeder is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Health and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 9 papers that have together received 160 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (1 paper), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper), Tryptophan and brain disorders (1 paper), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (1 paper), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (1 paper) and Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (30 citations), Health Informatics (5 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (41 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (28 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (5 citations). Scott E. Feeder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Frye, Joanna M. Biernacka, Doo‐Sup Choi, Gregory A. Poland, Simon Kung, Brian A. Palmer, Malik Nassan, G. Douglas Jenkins, Susannah J. Tye and Marin Veldić. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Sleep Medicine, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology and Translational Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.