Scott Ahlgren

49 papers receiving 661 citations

Peers

Scott Ahlgren
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Algebra and Number Theory 616
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 271
  • Mathematical Physics 293
  • Geometry and Topology 187
  • Applied Mathematics 78
Replace Valentin Blomer with:
Valentin Blomer Germany
Grigori Kolesnik United States
Jörg Brüdern Germany
Wenguang Zhai China
Линг Лонг United States
T. D. Browning United Kingdom
Maksym Radziwiłł United States
Aleksandar Ivić Serbia
Patrick Sargos France
Maxim Aleksandrovich Korolev Russia
Scott Ahlgren relative to Valentin Blomer Germany Valentin Blomer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Valentin Blomer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Ahlgren

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Ahlgren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Ahlgren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Ahlgren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Ahlgren

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Ahlgren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Ahlgren. The network helps show where Scott Ahlgren may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Scott Ahlgren, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Ahlgren Line = papers co-authored together Scott Ahlgren links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200088
2 200165
3 200065
4 200356
5 200138
6 199929
7
Addition and counting: the arithmetic of partitions
200125
8 200525
9 200025
10 200224
11 201122
12 200121
13 200316
14
200215
15 201514
16 201213
17 200213
18 200411
19 199810
20 200310

About Scott Ahlgren

Scott Ahlgren is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 49 papers that have together received 692 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytic Number Theory Research (35 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (30 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (30 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (20 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (12 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (2 papers), Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (2 papers) and Finite Group Theory Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (616 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (271 citations), Mathematical Physics (293 citations), Geometry and Topology (187 citations) and Applied Mathematics (78 citations). Scott Ahlgren has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and France. Frequent co-authors include Ken Ono, Jeremy Lovejoy, Byungchan Kim, Jeremy Lovejoy, Kathrin Bringmann, Bruce C. Berndt, Alexandru Zaharescu, Ae Ja Yee, Shalosh B. Ekhad and Doron Zeilberger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Number Theory, Mathematische Annalen, Mathematical Research Letters, American Journal of Mathematics and Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact